AR
Project Summary (at least 250 words): My Action Research Project of Implementing an
effective K-2 RTI program is on track. I began my project by meeting with the
teachers to tell them about my project. We fall short on documentation. We’re a
very small school so we’ve come to depend on communicating concerns to each
other simply because it’s easier, quicker, and we feel more one-on-one. I spoke
with the teachers about this and assured each of them that they were doing a
fantastic job. However, my concern was that we all have to start documenting if
we want to get help for our students. The law requires documentation. Parents
will also want to see documentation. Teachers understood this but needed help
on what documents to use. The right document was also a concern of mine. There
are so many documents out there and choosing the best one was a long process.
Finally, I was able to form a document that is easy for teachers to use. With
my principal’s approval of the document, I brought it to our weekly faculty
meeting and explained what exactly needed to be documented. All teachers seemed
very pleased with this form. The universal screening that my principal and
superintendent chose is the TPRI (Texas Primary Reading Inventory). Our
Kindergarten and 1st grade teachers just finished last week with
their first universal screening process. I will meet with them this week on
kids identified as possibly needing help (Tier 1). Our 2nd grade
teacher finished two weeks ago with universal screening. I met with her and we
identified at risk students. I’ve provided different strategies that she can
implement in her classroom. I talked with my principal concerning how long
teachers should document before we take the next step. She informed me that
teachers should document for nine weeks before we take the next step. I’m
anxious to speak with our 1st and 2nd grade teachers
about their TPRI tests. In my opinion, their TPRI’s should’ve been completed
two weeks ago just as 2nd grade. The 1st and 2nd
grade teachers are veteran teachers and they don’t like change. During our
meetings, they don’t voice any concerns and seem anxious to get started. They
are good teachers and want to help their students in any way possible. However,
documenting is something they’re not good at because they’ve never had to or
been held responsible if they didn’t. I have to handle them with “kid gloves”
to get them to begin the process of documentation. I know, though, that once
they get started with it and feel comfortable then they will be okay. Right now
documentation as well as RTI is new for them. It’s up to me to make them
understand RTI and to help them become comfortable with everything concerning
RTI. During the summer my principal ordered quite a few books on RTI. I’ve
started reading them to learn about different strategies that I can give our
teachers to help students.
Tuesday, October 2, 2012
Sunday, August 12, 2012
Revised Action Research Plan (8/12/2012)
|
Action
Planning Template
|
|||||
|
GOAL:
|
Implementing an effective K-2 Response to
Intervention (RTI)
program
at Palo Pinto ISD
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
Action
Step(s)
|
Person(s)
Responsible
|
Timeline:
Start/End
|
Needed
Resources
|
Evaluation
|
|
|
1. Ensure
curriculum is aligned with K-2 TEKS
|
Danna
Reed, Teresa Mahan
|
09/2012
– 12/2012
|
K-2
TEKS, lesson plans
|
Analyze
information
|
|
|
2. Examine
teaching intervention strategies to determine alignment with K-2 core curriculum
|
Danna
Reed, Teresa Mahan
|
09/2012
– 10/2012
|
K-2 TEKS,
textbooks, lesson plans
|
Classroom
observations, meetings with teachers and principal
|
|
|
3. Analyze
and examination of grade appropriate teaching strategies for K-2
|
Danna
Reed, Teresa Mahan
|
09/2012
– 05/2013
|
K-2
TEKS, professional development, financial resources for professional development
|
Classroom
observations, meetings with teachers and principal
|
|
|
4.Training
teachers on effective documentation procedures
|
Danna
Reed, Teresa Mahan
|
09/2012
– 12/2012
|
Computers
with internet access, professional development
|
Meetings
with teachers checking progress on documentation
|
|
|
5. Document
student achievement results to determine the need for staff training
|
Danna
Reed, Teresa Mahan
|
09/2012
– 10/2012
|
TPRI
scores, Reading Renaissance scores, Real Math scores, professional development
|
Analyze
test results
|
|
|
6. Collect
data from teacher documentation of intervention strategies being implemented
for at risk students to determine effectiveness
|
Danna
Reed, Teresa Mahan
|
09/2012
– 05/2013
|
TPRI
scores, student work, RTI forms
|
Analyze
information
|
|
|
7. Examine
Scope and Sequence along with teacher lesson plans
|
Danna
Reed, Teresa Mahan
|
09/2012
– 05/2013
|
Scope
and Sequence, K-2 TEKS, teacher lesson plans
|
Analyze
information
|
|
|
8. Determine
accessibility of internet based curriculum
|
Danna
Reed, Teresa Mahan
|
09/2012
– 10/2012
|
Computer
with internet access, K-2 TEKS
|
Analyze
information
|
|
|
9. Determine
the curriculum and technology programs being implemented in the classroom are
research based and data driven
|
Danna
Reed, Teresa Mahan
|
09/2012
– 05/2013
|
Computers
with internet access, researched based data, K-2 TEKS
|
Analyze
information, classroom observations, meeting with teachers and principal
|
|
|
10. Determine
the gap between a student’s present level of performance and expected level
of performance
|
Danna
Reed, Teresa Mahan
|
09/2012
– 05/2013
|
TPRI
scores, Reading Renaissance scores, student work, teacher documentation
|
Analyze
information, meetings with teachers, principal, and parents
|
|
|
11. Identify
at risk K-2 students
|
Danna
Reed, Teresa Mahan
|
09/2012
– 05/2013
|
TPRI
scores, Reading Renaissance scores, student work, teacher documentation
|
Analyze
information, meetings with teachers, principal, and parents
|
|
Saturday, August 4, 2012
Action Research Plan (Updated)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)